Gender-Neutral Rape Laws: A Call for Reform in India

My name is Sheikh Arsalan Ullah Chishti, and I am the founder of the Bahujan Queer Society, a platform that advocates for the rights and empowerment of marginalized communities in India. Through this research, I seek to highlight a critical gap in our legal framework: the absence of comprehensive, gender-neutral rape laws that acknowledge survivors of all genders. While sexual violence is a traumatic reality for countless individuals, India’s legal definition of rape focuses solely on crimes perpetrated by a man against a woman. This narrow lens fails to address the experiences of male survivors, transgender people, and non-binary individuals, effectively silencing them in the eyes of the law.

Over the years, numerous activist groups, legal experts, and survivors have called for the introduction of gender-neutral legislation. Despite these efforts, legislative and judicial reforms remain disproportionately centered on cisgender female survivors. This approach inadvertently neglects the many survivors who do not fit traditional gender or sexual orientation categories. In a nation as diverse as India, such legal constraints run contrary to the constitutional promise of equality and justice for all.

The legislative overhaul brought forth by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) was a moment of anticipation for those who believed in more inclusive legal frameworks. However, Section 63 of the BNS continues to define rape in a manner that excludes men, transgender individuals, and non-binary survivors. The law’s singular focus on a man raping a woman leaves a significant portion of survivors without any legal recourse or recognition. This glaring omission has profound implications, from underreporting of crimes to perpetuating harmful societal myths about what constitutes sexual violence and who can be a victim.

My personal commitment to change stems from a broader human rights perspective. This is not a battle of men versus women; it is a struggle to ensure that all survivors—regardless of their gender identity—are treated with the dignity, respect, and justice they deserve. The criminal justice system should not discriminate on the basis of gender, particularly when the objective is to address one of the most heinous violations of personal autonomy and bodily integrity.

In parallel to our advocacy efforts through the Bahujan Queer Society, we are also in the process of preparing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to bring this matter before the courts. By making this research public from the outset, we aim to create a transparent foundation that not only bolsters our legal arguments but also informs public dialogue and inspires grassroots activism. The hope is that, if the government itself will not enact truly gender-neutral rape laws, we will galvanize enough support—legal, political, and social—to enact them through judicial or legislative channels. In doing so, we seek to set a precedent that paves the way for a more inclusive, equitable India.

OBJECTIVE OF THE RESEARCH

1. Analyze the Existing Legal Framework and Its Limitations
   Provide an in-depth exploration of how rape is currently defined under Indian law—particularly the BNS, which replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC). We will examine key sections that leave male and transgender survivors unprotected.
2. Document Historical and Recent Cases Involving Male and Transgender Survivors
   Present documented cases, precedents, and any judicial observations that shed light on the realities of male and transgender survivors. Although documentation may be scarce, this research will consolidate whatever evidence is available into a single, comprehensive repository.
3. Provide Statistical Evidence on the Prevalence of Sexual Assault Against Men and Transgender Individuals
   Compile data from government records, non-governmental organizations, academic research, and international bodies to highlight the prevalence of sexual assault among these often-overlooked groups.
4. Compare India’s Laws with Gender-Neutral Rape Legislation Worldwide
   Offer insights into how other jurisdictions define rape in a gender-neutral manner and evaluate how those frameworks might serve as models for India’s legislative reforms.
5. Propose Actionable Recommendations for Legal Reform
   Suggest reforms that address current legal voids while respecting cultural nuances. These recommendations will range from immediate interim measures to long-term policy initiatives.

By consolidating extensive data, rigorous analysis, and factual case studies, this research paper will serve as a cornerstone for both legal interventions and broader public advocacy. It aims to be a resource for attorneys, policymakers, scholars, activists, and survivors who share the vision of a more inclusive and just legal system.

LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR RAPE LAWS IN INDIA

Understanding the evolution of rape laws in India is critical to contextualizing the current debate on gender neutrality. Historically, Indian jurisprudence has been shaped by colonial-era statutes, most notably the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which came into force in 1860. The IPC laid down various offenses and penalties, including provisions pertaining to sexual crimes. Over time, public outcry and emerging social movements led to amendments in these laws; however, the fundamental notion of rape as a crime committed by a man against a woman largely remained unaltered.

Colonial Roots and the Indian Penal Code (IPC)

• The IPC was drafted under the British colonial government, primarily reflecting the societal norms of the Victorian era. Section 375 of the IPC defined rape as an act of sexual penetration by a man against a woman, specifically excluding other gender identities and framing the woman as the sole “victim” archetype.
• The historical context of patriarchy and gender roles influenced the language of early laws. Women, seen as dependents requiring special protection, were the central focus, while men were universally portrayed as potential perpetrators.
• Critiques of the colonial model have pointed out its disregard for male, transgender, and non-binary survivors. The concept of “outraging the modesty” of a woman (under Section 354 of the IPC) underscored gendered assumptions, positioning womanhood itself as an object requiring protection rather than focusing on the violation of personal autonomy.

Post-Independence Amendments and the Push for Reform

• After India gained independence in 1947, lawmakers began to adapt or repeal some colonial laws. However, significant portions of the IPC’s definition of rape remained intact for decades.
• The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 1983 introduced certain changes, including the recognition of custodial rape (e.g., rape of a woman in police custody), but did not challenge the foundational idea that only women can be rape victims in the eyes of the law.
• Reforms in the mid to late 20th century often stemmed from high-profile cases that ignited public outrage. For instance, the Mathura Rape Case (1972) and the subsequent Supreme Court judgment triggered nationwide debates. Yet, even amid public pressure, the scope of legal changes focused on strengthening women’s protections, without extending the conversation to other genders.

Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013

• Spurred by the 2012 Delhi gang rape case, also known as the Nirbhaya case, the Indian government enacted extensive amendments to sexual offense laws. These amendments broadened the definition of rape and enhanced penalties for sexual crimes.
• Despite the expansion, the language primarily centered on female survivors, preserving the binary framework that a victim must be a woman and the offender must be a man.
• Additional offenses such as stalking and voyeurism were introduced, but the reforms did not address male or transgender survivors explicitly. Legal scholars noted the legislation’s progressiveness in terms of stronger penalties, but criticized its lack of inclusivity.

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 63

• In an attempt to modernize India’s legal code, the IPC was recently replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). This legislative shift was marketed as a major overhaul intended to reflect contemporary social realities and decongest the criminal justice system.
• Unfortunately, Section 63 of the BNS continues to define rape in terms of an act committed by a man against a woman, echoing the same restrictive interpretation from the IPC era. The wording does not account for male survivors, nor does it explicitly include transgender or non-binary survivors.
• Many activists and legal experts view this as a missed opportunity. While other sections may offer incremental improvements in prosecution speed or procedural clarity, the fundamental exclusion of other genders from the legal definition of rape remains glaring.

Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019

• India took a step towards acknowledging transgender rights by enacting this legislation, aimed at prohibiting discrimination against transgender individuals in employment, education, and healthcare, among other spheres.
• However, this Act does not address sexual assault or rape crimes against transgender individuals in a specific manner. Consequently, transgender people remain in a gray area, unable to leverage rape laws that are strictly codified to protect cisgender women.
• Legal experts argue that while the Transgender Persons Act recognizes the fundamental rights of transgender individuals, it fails to integrate those rights into the broader criminal justice framework.

Judicial Interpretation and the Role of Higher Courts

• In some High Court and Supreme Court observations, judges have hinted at the need for more inclusive definitions of sexual offenses, though there is no binding precedent that officially expands the definition of rape beyond the male-against-female scope.
• Public Interest Litigations (PILs) have occasionally been filed to challenge the constitutionality of gender-specific laws. While some rulings have emphasized equal protection under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, the courts have yet to deliver a definitive, sweeping judgment that mandates gender-neutral language in rape law.
• Incremental victories, such as cases recognizing the rights of transgender individuals, often stop short of reclassifying crimes like rape to be fully gender-neutral. Consequently, India’s higher judiciary has not taken a conclusive stance, leaving legislative reforms as the primary avenue for change.

Societal Attitudes and the Reluctance to Reform

• Beyond the statutes, societal perceptions play a significant role in shaping the discourse around rape. Persistent stereotypes—such as the notion that men are always perpetrators and cannot be victims—contribute to a lack of political will for reform.
• Campaigns addressing violence against women have rightly gained momentum, but parallel issues of male and transgender victimization often receive less attention and skepticism. This sociocultural backdrop makes it harder to advocate for and enact gender-neutral laws.
• Organizations working with male survivors or transgender survivors often report underreporting due to stigma, shame, and the absence of legal protections. Consequently, statistical data remains incomplete, feeding the misconception that rape is a predominantly female-centric issue.

The Emerging Demand for Gender-Neutral Legislation

• Civil society organizations, LGBTQIA+ advocacy groups, and legal professionals have increasingly called for an inclusive approach. Their stance is anchored in fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution—particularly Articles 14 (Equality before Law) and 21 (Protection of Life and Personal Liberty).
• Critics highlight that maintaining a gender-specific definition of rape is both unconstitutional and detrimental to justice. They argue that laws should address the violation of bodily autonomy, irrespective of the victim’s or perpetrator’s gender identity.
• Notably, several countries worldwide have enacted gender-neutral definitions of sexual assault, setting examples that India can potentially emulate. These frameworks focus on consent and violation rather than rigid gender constructs.

Why This Debate Matters

• The exclusion of male and transgender survivors undermines the universal principle that everyone has the right to bodily integrity. It also perpetuates silence, preventing survivors from speaking out and seeking legal recourse.
• Gender-neutral laws would not diminish protections for women; rather, they would broaden the scope of protections to include everyone. This shift fosters a more equitable society and mitigates harm caused by gaps in current legal statutes.
• Updating statutes to be gender-neutral aligns with India’s obligations under international human rights law, including treaties like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which obligate states to ensure equal protection for all citizens.

By examining the trajectory of India’s rape laws—from colonial-era statutes to the BNS—it becomes evident that while strides have been made in protecting women, systemic blind spots remain for other genders. The move toward a gender-neutral framework is not only constitutionally sound but also morally imperative. Future sections of this paper will delve into specific case studies, empirical data, and comparative analyses with other jurisdictions to strengthen the argument for comprehensive reform. Ultimately, the legal landscape must evolve to serve all survivors of sexual violence, ensuring justice is neither restricted by nor contingent upon one’s gender identity.

HISTORICAL AND RECENT CASES INVOLVING MALE AND TRANSGENDER SURVIVORS

While empirical data on sexual violence against men, transgender, and non-binary individuals in India remains scant, there are documented cases and anecdotal evidence that paint a troubling picture. Underreporting is widespread due to stigma, social conditioning, and the fact that legal frameworks offer little or no protection to these survivors. Below is an exploration of notable instances, patterns that emerge from reported cases, and the broader societal barriers that affect these survivors’ access to justice.

Underreporting and Social Stigma

• Cultural Conditioning: Indian society, like many others, has been shaped by patriarchal norms that view men as protectors and women as those who need protection. When men or male-assigned individuals at birth are sexually violated, they often face disbelief and shame. For transgender persons, the discrimination can be even harsher, as societal misconceptions label them deviant or hyper-sexualized.
• Fear of Mockery or Ostracism: Male survivors who attempt to report sexual assault are sometimes met with ridicule, refusal to file First Information Reports (FIRs), or indifference from authorities. For transgender survivors, police stations can be hostile environments due to transphobia and a general lack of awareness about transgender identities.
• Lack of Legal Recourse: Since India’s primary laws on rape (now under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, earlier under the IPC) do not recognize male or transgender survivors, filing a case under “rape” is legally untenable. Often, lawyers and police have to resort to lesser charges like “unnatural offenses” or “assault,” which do not fully address the gravity of the crime.

Known Documented Cases Involving Male Survivors

1. Kerala Case (2014)

• Summary: A young man alleged sexual abuse by multiple individuals over a period. Despite medical evidence, the police could not file charges under Section 375 of the IPC (applicable at that time) because it only recognized female survivors. Instead, the case proceeded under Section 377 (Unnatural Offences), which carried its own stigmatizing implications.
• References:
  • Local Malayalam media outlets (unnamed here to protect survivor identity).
  • Statements from local NGOs (names withheld in most media reports to maintain survivor confidentiality).

2. Sexual Violence in Juvenile Institutions

• Observation Homes and Child-Care Facilities:
  • Multiple NGO and Commission Reports (2000s–Present): Various government inquiry commissions (e.g., reports by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, NCPCR) and NGOs have documented instances of boys facing sexual abuse in state-run or private child-care institutions.
  • Underreporting: Due to fear of retaliation, many victims did not come forward until NGOs intervened. Most cases were charged under provisions related to child abuse or “unnatural offenses,” rather than “rape,” due to legal constraints prior to the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012).
• References:
  • NCPCR reports on child abuse in juvenile homes (various years, publicly accessible on the Commission’s website).
  • NGO-led investigative studies (e.g., Save the Children, HAQ Centre for Child Rights) with anecdotal or aggregated data.

3. Cases Involving Male Domestic Workers

• Summary: Several NGOs that focus on labor rights and domestic worker welfare have shared anonymized case studies of male domestic workers being sexually exploited by employers.
  • Nature of Abuse: Ranges from coerced sexual acts to repeated harassment.
  • Legal Challenges: Because existing rape laws did not recognize male survivors, these incidents were typically lodged under assault, molestation, or at times “attempt to commit unnatural offenses.”
• References:
  • Reports from local labor rights NGOs (some mention of these cases in annual newsletters or press releases).
  • Occasional coverage in regional newspapers (titles withheld to protect survivor privacy).

4. Allegations by Adult Male Survivors in Police Custody

• Summary: Human Rights groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have occasionally documented cases of alleged custodial sexual abuse involving adult men.
  • Challenges: Victims often do not come forward due to threats, intimidation, or re-traumatization.
  • Outcomes: In most instances, legal proceedings—if any—were not pursued under “rape” but rather under broader human rights violation claims or “unnatural offenses.”
• References:
• Amnesty International & Human Rights Watch periodic country reports on India (various years).
• Occasional references in academic articles on custodial violence.

5. Cases of Sexual Violence Against Migrant Male Laborers

• Summary: Some migrant male laborers, particularly those living in cramped labor camps or at work sites (such as construction sites), have anonymously reported incidents of sexual coercion or assault by supervisors or fellow workers.
  • Legal Outcomes: Minimal; extremely underreported due to fear of job loss, deportation (in the case of non-Indian nationals), or further violence.
• References:
  • Interviews and case studies by grassroots organizations working with migrant populations, mostly unpublished or found in small local bulletins.
  • Occasional local media exposés focusing on labor exploitation.

6. University Hostel Incidents

• Summary: A handful of cases have emerged from men’s hostels at universities, cited in student-led journals or campus newspapers, detailing sexual assault or ragging that escalated to sexual violence.
  • Reporting and Action: University disciplinary committees often handled these cases internally; police involvement was rare.
  • References:
• Campus newspapers from various universities (not typically mainstream national news).
• Some references in social media discussions, though details usually remain anonymous.

7. Notable Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and Affidavits

• Summary: While not always tied to specific named survivors, some PILs referencing male sexual abuse have included anonymized details of real cases to highlight the need for law reform.
  • Examples: PILs filed in High Courts or the Supreme Court discussing gender-neutral assault laws or male child sexual abuse.
• References:
  • Publicly available court documents or judgments (when not sealed).
  • Occasional legal commentary in law journals or by advocacy groups.

8. Case of a Domestic Worker in Bangalore (2016)

• Location: Private residence in Indiranagar, Bangalore
• Age of Survivor: 28-year-old male
• Summary: The survivor alleged repeated coerced sexual acts by the employer. After approaching a labor rights NGO, an FIR was registered under assault and molestation sections rather than “rape,” reflecting legal gaps for male survivors.
• References:
  • NGO Annual Report (2017); mention in Deccan Herald article on domestic worker exploitation.

9. Migrant Laborer in Punjab (2017)

• Location: A construction site near Ludhiana
• Age of Survivor: 30-year-old male worker from Bihar
• Summary: The survivor accused his supervisor of sexual coercion. Local police declined to register it under “rape,” citing lack of legal provision for male victims. The case was ultimately dismissed.
• References:
  • Brief coverage in local Punjabi dailies; bulletins from a grassroots labor NGO.

10. Tihar Jail Abuse Allegations (2018)

• Location: Tihar Jail, Delhi
• Age of Survivor: 35-year-old male inmate
• Summary: Survivor reported sexual violence by senior inmates and a warden. Legal action proceeded under generic assault charges; “rape” was never invoked.
• References:
  • Amnesty International India report on custodial violence (2019 edition); local media portal coverage.

11. College Hostel Incident in Kolkata (2018)

• Location: Men’s hostel affiliated with Kolkata University
• Age of Survivors: Multiple male students aged 19–21
• Summary: Ragging escalated into instances of sexual humiliation. Internal campus inquiry took place, but no FIR under rape laws was filed due to the survivors being adult males.
• References:
  • Student-led campus magazine; mentions in local Bengali newspapers.

12. PIL with Adult Male Affidavits (2018)

• Location: Filed in the Bombay High Court
• Age of Survivors: Two men in their 20s who provided affidavits
• Summary: The PIL sought legislative changes to then IPC Section 375, citing the experiences of these adult male survivors. Though the High Court acknowledged the issue, it deferred it to legislative competence.
• References:
  • Bombay High Court cause list (brief entries); legal commentary in newspapers and advocacy group newsletters.

13. Male Sex Worker in Mumbai (2019)

• Location: Red-light area in South Mumbai
• Age of Survivor: Approximately 25 years old
• Summary: Survivor reported repeated sexual violence by multiple clients. Fearing criminalization and social stigma, he never pursued a formal rape complaint. Instead, he approached an NGO, which documented the case as forced exploitation.
• References:
  • Internal NGO documents focused on HIV/AIDS outreach; short blog post on sex workers’ rights.

14. Custodial Abuse in Uttar Pradesh (2019)

• Location: A district lockup in UP
• Age of Survivor: 29-year-old male
• Summary: Survivor alleged sexual assault by police officials. Local activists demanded an investigation under custodial violence laws; official records show charges of “unnatural offenses” but no mention of “rape.”
• References:
  • Human Rights Watch country reports; local Hindi newspaper exposés.

15. Male Domestic Worker in Hyderabad (2020)

• Location: Gated community, Gachibowli
• Age of Survivor: 25-year-old male
• Summary: Survivor claimed coerced sexual acts by a high-profile employer. Police registered an FIR under general assault provisions; intense societal pressure led to an out-of-court settlement.
• References:
  • Press release from a labor NGO (2021); short mention in a Telugu news portal.

16. Migrant Brick Kiln Laborers in Rajasthan (2021)

• Location: Brick kiln near Ajmer
• Age of Survivors: A group of men, aged 20–35
• Summary: Multiple laborers alleged sexual exploitation by contractors. After an NGO’s intervention, a complaint was filed under “unnatural offenses.” No “rape” charges were pursued.
• References:
  • Field notes by a migrant welfare NGO; scattered local media coverage.

17. Male Live-In Partner Abuse in Pune (2022)

• Location: Pune, Maharashtra
• Age of Survivor: 26-year-old male
• Summary: Survivor alleged repeated sexual violence by his male partner. The complaint ended up being lodged under IPC sections for assault and intimidation, as Indian rape laws did not extend to male survivors.
• References:
  • Unpublished NGO case study on intimate partner violence; short coverage in local news portals.

18. Torture Allegations in Central Prison, Madhya Pradesh (2022)

• Location: A central prison facility in MP
• Age of Survivor: 40-year-old inmate
• Summary: Survivor claimed sexual and physical abuse by fellow inmates. The official inquiry categorized it under “unnatural offenses,” avoiding the term “rape.”
• References:
  • Letter to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC); minimal local press coverage.

19. Sexual Coercion in a Delhi PG Accommodation (2022)

• Location: Shared Paying Guest setup in South Delhi
• Age of Survivor: 24-year-old male professional
• Summary: Survivor reported coerced acts by a roommate, but was told by local police that “rape” did not apply for male victims. The case was classified under “molestation” and “intimidation.”
• References:
  • Social media advocacy threads on Twitter; informal notes from an LGBT+ help center.

20. Workplace Assault in IT Office, Bangalore (2022)

• Location: Mid-sized IT company in Whitefield
• Age of Survivor: 29-year-old male software engineer
• Summary: Survivor alleged sexual harassment escalating to forced physical contact by a higher-up. Company’s internal committee recommended the accused’s termination, but no FIR for “rape” was lodged.
• References:
  • Internal HR documents (partially leaked on social media); coverage in a local tech news site.

21. Assault on a Male Tenant, Jaipur (2022)

• Location: Rented flat in Jaipur
• Age of Survivor: 27-year-old male tenant
• Summary: Landlord allegedly subjected the tenant to sexual harassment and attempted assault. Police recorded a case under “outraging modesty,” dismissing the possibility of “rape” due to the male victim.
• References:
  • Summaries on a local Rajasthani channel; NGO bulletin on tenant harassment.

22. Male Survivor from Corporate Sector, Gurgaon (2023)

• Location: Corporate housing in Gurgaon
• Age of Survivor: 32-year-old management executive
• Summary: Survivor reported sexual violence by a co-resident colleague during off-site training. HR handled it as a code-of-conduct violation; no criminal “rape” charges were filed.
• References:
  • Corporate HR internal notes circulated among employees; short social media mention on LinkedIn whistleblower post.

23. Group Assault in a Kerala Coastal Town (2023)

• Location: Coastal suburb in Kerala
• Age of Survivor: 35-year-old male fisherman
• Summary: Survivor alleged gang sexual assault by acquaintances under influence of alcohol. Police filed a case under “common intention” (IPC 34) and “unnatural offenses,” not labeling it as rape.
• References:
  • Brief coverage in Malayalam daily news; references in local fishing community forum.

24. Private Security Guard Incident in Mumbai (2023)

• Location: High-rise apartment in Andheri
• Age of Survivor: 28-year-old male security guard
• Summary: Survivor accused a resident of repeated sexual advances and eventual coercion. The building management tried to hush it up, and the survivor resigned. No FIR under “rape” was registered.
• References:
  • Local apartment association notice; short bullet point in a city-based investigative blog.

25. Case of Male Bar Dancer in Goa (2023)

• Location: Nightclub in North Goa
• Age of Survivor: 26-year-old male performer
• Summary: Survivor reported forced sexual acts by a patron. The nightclub management discouraged him from going to the police; eventually, a complaint was filed as molestation, not “rape.”
• References:
  • Informal coverage in local nightlife forums; NGO statement focusing on exploitation in the bar/club industry.

26. Supreme Court PIL on Male Rape Survivors (2023)

• Location: Filed in the Supreme Court of India
• Age of Survivors: Various adult males (anonymized affidavits)
• Summary: The PIL consolidates multiple statements from adult male survivors seeking recognition under a gender-neutral rape law. The Court has yet to hold a final hearing or issue a verdict.
• References:
  • Supreme Court e-filing portal (case reference sealed); mentions in a legal forum newsletter.

 

1. Challenges Faced by Transgender Survivors
   • Police Harassment: Transgender individuals frequently face harassment when they approach law enforcement to report crimes. In some instances, survivors have reported additional abuse, including verbal and physical assaults in police stations.
   • Lack of Specific Legal Provisions: The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, while prohibiting discrimination, does not clearly define or criminalize sexual violence against transgender persons under “rape” or a similar offense. This legal gap forces transgender survivors to seek justice under generic or lesser charges, which fail to acknowledge the severity of the crime.
   • High-Profile Cases Going Unnoticed: Instances of gang rape against transgender individuals have occasionally appeared in media reports or local NGO documentation. Despite their shocking nature, these cases often do not gain widespread attention or result in convictions. Many are settled out of court due to fear and social pressure.

 

1. Institutional Violence and Custodial Rapes

Male Custodial Rape and Institutional Violence

1.1 Occasional Mentions in Human Rights Reports

• Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch: In their periodic country reports, these organizations have documented multiple allegations of custodial torture, some referencing sexual abuse of men. While these reports generally do not provide explicit identities or detailed case-by-case data to protect survivors and sources, they highlight patterns of violence in police stations and prisons across various states in India.
  • Key Insight: Survivors often fear reprisals, making official complaints rare. In the absence of gender-neutral laws, many incidents never reach the courts as “rape” cases.

1.2 Court Petitions and PILs

• Public Interest Litigations (PILs): Over the years, a few PILs have been filed, challenging the government on custodial violence. While many focus on torture or extrajudicial actions, some include affidavits alleging sexual assault on male detainees.
  • Example: Certain PILs referencing “abuse in custody” have been filed in High Courts (e.g., in states like Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh), occasionally containing mentions of sexual humiliation tactics or assaults on men. These documents, when not sealed, sometimes appear in legal databases or news coverage, albeit with limited details to protect survivors.

1.3 State-Specific Media Exposés

• Tihar Jail and Other Major Prisons: Off-and-on reports from investigative journalists and local newspapers have alluded to the sexual victimization of male inmates—sometimes perpetrated by fellow inmates, occasionally implicating wardens or guards.
  • Challenges: Stigma, fear, and lack of legal definitions typically relegate such incidents to being reported (if at all) under “unnatural offenses” or “assault,” rather than rape.
  • References: Sporadic newspaper or TV news stories (dates and publication names vary); some coverage gets retracted or remains behind paywalls.

1.4 NHRC (National Human Rights Commission) Complaints

• The NHRC occasionally receives complaints of custodial violence that include allegations of sexual assault on adult male detainees. However, official data specifically categorizing incidents as “custodial rape” is extremely rare, since Indian law until now has not recognized adult male victims under the rape definition.
  • Outcome: Many complaints end up being classified more generally under physical torture or third-degree interrogation methods, without distinctly highlighting sexual elements.

Transgender Detainees: Heightened Vulnerability

2.1 Placement in Male or Female Wards

• Incorrect Ward Assignments: Transgender individuals are often placed in wards based on inconsistent legal or biological definitions (e.g., assigned male at birth but identifying as female, or vice versa). This mismatch frequently leads to heightened risks of sexual violence from inmates or even authorities.
  • NGO Documentation: Groups like Sampoorna, Naz Foundation, and other LGBTQIA+ advocacy collectives have reported scattered, anonymized accounts of transgender detainees facing physical and sexual abuse in lockups or prisons.

2.2 Harassment by Officials

• Verbal, Physical, and Sexual Abuse: Several transgender individuals who have been detained (sometimes for sex work, petty crime, or false charges) describe incidents of strip-search humiliation or coercive sexual acts.
  • References:
    • Informal affidavits or statements submitted to NGOs and lawyers’ collectives.
    • Occasional media coverage highlighting “custodial torture” faced by the Hijra or broader transgender community.

2.3 Absence of a Clear Legal Framework

• No Gender-Neutral Rape Provision: Because current laws define rape as an act by a man against a woman, transgender survivors effectively lack recourse under “rape” provisions. Most cases—if they get filed—fall under assault or “unnatural offenses.”
  • Impact: The legal lacuna fosters chronic underreporting and minimal prosecution rates for sexual crimes targeting transgender detainees.

Notable (Though Limited) Examples and References

1. Amnesty International Country Reports (Various Years)
   • Highlight cases of torture and ill-treatment in custody, occasionally noting sexual abuse of men and transgender people, though typically without revealing identifying case details.
2. Human Rights Watch Reports
   • Document patterns of custodial violence in South Asian countries, including India. Some annual or thematic reports mention male sexual abuse but do not classify it formally as rape because of India’s legal definitions.
3. National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) Complaints
   • Certain publicly accessible complaint summaries (especially from the mid-2000s to early 2010s) refer to sexual victimization or threats in prison. Detailed follow-up reports, if any, are rarely made public.
4. NGO and Activist Disclosures
   • Sampoorna, Naz Foundation, and allied LGBTQIA+ nonprofits occasionally mention custodial abuse against trans detainees in internal reports, workshops, or press briefings.
5. News Outlets / Investigative Journalism
   • Sporadic coverage on local TV channels or newspapers, particularly around prison riots, mass complaints, or suicides, can reveal allegations of sexual misconduct involving wardens or staff. Coverage seldom evolves into a sustained investigation or public trial.
6. Academic Research / Law School Journals
   • A handful of articles in Indian and international law journals discuss the theoretical aspects of male rape or custodial sexual violence. While these do not always list individual cases, they cite general trends and the paucity of official data.

 

1. Judicial Responses and Observations

High Court Remarks and Obiter Dicta

1.1 Passing Observations on Gender Inclusivity

• Context: Some High Courts, during the course of hearing bail applications or appeals in sexual assault cases, have made obiter dicta (non-binding remarks) hinting that sexual violence can occur against any gender.
  • Examples:
    • Observations that “sexual assault need not be confined to women alone” or “lawmakers must consider that men and other genders can also be victims.”
  • Outcome: Since these statements are not part of the final judgment or ratio decidendi, they do not carry binding legal force.
  • References:
    • Various High Court orders from states like Delhi, Bombay, and Karnataka have been informally cited by legal scholars, but official names and citations are often omitted to respect interim or sealed orders.

1.2 No Expansion to IPC/BNS Definitions

• Despite these forward-thinking remarks, High Courts have not taken the step of expanding or reinterpreting Section 375 of the IPC (pre-BNS) or Section 63 of the BNS to include male or transgender survivors.
  • Reason: Courts typically defer such expansions to the legislature, stating that altering the statutory definition of “rape” would exceed judicial power and require legislative amendment.

2. Supreme Court’s Call for Legislative Changes

2.1 Advocacy for Broader Interpretations

• Notable Statements: The Supreme Court of India has occasionally recognized the possibility that the law should address sexual violence beyond the male-against-female paradigm, especially in contexts such as harassment, assault, or defamation cases involving transgender individuals.
  • Example:
    • Some Supreme Court benches have referenced Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 15 (Prohibition of Discrimination) to highlight that the spirit of the Constitution does not exclude any gender from protection against violence.

2.2 Lack of Direct Rulings on Gender-Neutral Rape

• Absence of Binding Precedents: The Supreme Court has not delivered a specific ruling that redefines rape to be gender-neutral.
  • Reasoning in Judgments: When dealing with sexual assault cases, the Court interprets existing laws (IPC or now the BNS) as they are written, often noting that any major overhaul of definitions must come from Parliament.
  • Consequences: While these observations help build momentum for legal reforms, they do not alter the legal status quo.

2.3 Inclusion of Third-Gender Perspectives in Other Contexts

• Inclusion in Broader Gender Rights: Post the NALSA vs. Union of India (2014) judgment, the Supreme Court opened the door for acknowledging third-gender rights in areas like employment, education, and healthcare. Although sexual violence was not the primary focus, the ruling underscored that transgender individuals deserve equal protection under the law.
  • Implication: A few Justices have noted in subsequent judgments that this constitutional protection should logically extend to matters of sexual assault, but no explicit ruling has solidified that stance.

3. Public Interest Litigations (PILs)

3.1 Challenges to Gender-Specific Rape Laws

• Filing and Status: Several PILs have been filed at High Courts and the Supreme Court, arguing that the existing laws (IPC Section 375 or BNS Section 63) are unconstitutional due to their exclusion of male and transgender survivors.
  • Examples:
    • PILs brought by certain NGOs, activist lawyers, or even individual survivors challenging the constitutionality of gender-specific definitions.
  • Outcomes:
    • Many of these PILs were dismissed on technical grounds, such as lack of locus standi or insufficient evidence. Others remain pending, with no interim relief or major judicial statement expanding rape definitions.

3.2 Notable Reasons for Dismissal or Delay

• Legislative Domain: Courts often cite separation of powers, indicating that expanding the definition of rape requires legislative action rather than judicial intervention.
• Absence of Detailed Statistical Evidence: PILs sometimes fail to present substantial empirical data or case precedents showing a large number of male/transgender survivors being denied justice, making it easier for courts to argue that the need for intervention has not been adequately proven.

3.3 Future Prospects

• With growing public discourse and better documentation of male/transgender survivors, ongoing or newly filed PILs may stand a stronger chance of spurring judicial action. However, at present, there is no conclusive ruling mandating an inclusive definition of rape.

 

1. International Parallels and Their Relevance

1. South Africa

1.1 Legislative Framework

• Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007
  • Expands the definition of rape to cover any form of unlawful and intentional sexual penetration without consent, explicitly removing any mention of the gender of the perpetrator or survivor.
  • Recognizes a range of penetrative acts, including oral and anal, ensuring survivors of all genders are covered.

1.2 Socio-Legal Impact

• Corrective Rape Cases: South Africa has faced high-profile incidents of “corrective rape” against lesbian and transgender individuals. The gender-neutral framing of the law theoretically enables better prosecution of such crimes, though enforcement remains uneven due to societal stigma and resource constraints.
• Advocacy and Enforcement: NGOs and human rights bodies have praised the Act for its inclusivity, though they acknowledge gaps in police training and judicial sensitivity. Implementation on the ground often lags behind the progressive legal text.

1.3 Relevance for India

• Feasibility: South Africa’s move to gender-neutral definitions demonstrates that a comprehensive legal overhaul is possible in a post-colonial context with entrenched patriarchal norms.
• Case Studies for Activists: Indian NGOs and legal scholars frequently cite South African legislation to bolster arguments for a similar inclusive approach in India, emphasizing that progressive laws can exist even amidst broader societal challenges.

2. United Kingdom

2.1 Sexual Offences Act, 2003

• Definition of Rape:
  • Focused specifically on non-consensual penile penetration of the mouth, anus, or vagina. While this aspect retains a degree of gender specificity (requiring a penis for the offense of rape), the Act establishes multiple other offenses—such as “assault by penetration” and “sexual assault”—that are gender-neutral.
• Consent-Centric Approach:
  • The statute emphasizes the concept of consent and includes detailed guidelines about situations where consent may be deemed absent (e.g., intoxication, coercion, fraud).

2.2 Practical Outcomes

• Layered Offenses: Survivors who do not fit neatly into the “penetrative rape” scenario, including male and transgender individuals, can seek justice under sexual assault laws carrying serious penalties.
• Mixed Views: Some critics argue the definition of rape remains too narrow, but the accompanying range of offenses provides a workable degree of inclusivity for prosecuting sexual crimes against all genders.

2.3 Relevance for India

• Multi-Tiered Model: Activists in India view the UK’s model as a potential blueprint. Even if the term “rape” remains partly gender-specific in any initial reforms, parallel gender-neutral offenses could still offer robust legal remedies.
• Judicial and Police Training: UK law enforcement and courts undergo specialized training for handling sexual offense cases. This highlights the importance of complementary reforms in India, beyond the mere wording of statutes.

3. Nepal and Bangladesh

3.1 Nepal’s Penal Code

• Existing Provisions:
  • Nepal still follows a gendered definition of rape, focusing on male perpetrator and female victim. However, the legal community and some judicial commentary have begun to acknowledge male sexual abuse and call for expansions.
• Incremental Change:
  • Occasional calls from parliamentarians and civil society hint at the possibility of modernizing definitions. Adoption of gender-neutral language has been slow but is part of ongoing legal discourse.

3.2 Bangladesh’s Legal Status

• Colonial Roots:
  • Much like India and Pakistan, Bangladesh inherited colonial-era legal definitions where rape is primarily seen as a crime against women.
• Push for Reforms:
  • NGOs, activists, and select judicial figures have voiced the need to expand definitions, particularly in light of increased reporting of violence against LGBTQIA+ individuals.

3.3 Relevance for India

1. Cultural Parallels:
   • Given Nepal and Bangladesh share historical and cultural ties with India, the slow but growing dialogue around male and transgender survivors resonates within the Indian context.
2. Regional Advocacy:
   • Efforts in neighboring countries can create a collective push in South Asia toward more inclusive policies. Legal scholars often cite these parallels to argue that if incremental changes are possible there, similar reforms could be viable in India.

 

1. Media Coverage and Its Role
   • Sensitivity and Visibility: When male or transgender rape cases surface in mainstream media, they often face sensationalism or trivialization, reinforcing societal bias. Adequate, sensitive reporting is essential for public awareness and policy change.
   • Impact of Social Media: Platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook have served as alternate avenues where survivors and advocacy groups share firsthand accounts and mobilize support. Hashtags and viral posts have occasionally brought attention to lesser-known cases that traditional media outlets failed to cover.
   • NGO and Activist Publications: A limited but growing body of literature exists, compiled by NGOs and independent researchers who focus on male and transgender survivors. While not as widely cited as data on violence against women, these publications fill critical gaps in state-sponsored statistics.

 

1. Implications for Legal Reform

1. Constitutional Mandate

1.1 Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution

• Article 14 (Equality Before Law)
  • Guarantees that all citizens are entitled to equal protection under the law. Gender-specific definitions of rape that exclude men and transgender individuals undermine this principle, effectively creating a legal vacuum for a subset of survivors.
• Article 21 (Protection of Life and Personal Liberty)
  • Affirms that every person’s life and personal liberty must be safeguarded. When the law fails to recognize sexual violence against men and transgender survivors, it violates their constitutional right to bodily autonomy and protection from harm.

1.2 Potential Constitutional Challenges

• Public Interest Litigations (PILs)
  • Several PILs have argued that the gender-specific approach to rape contravenes constitutional guarantees. While some remain pending, the constitutional argument is central: denying redress to survivors because of their gender identity is inherently discriminatory.
• Judicial Scrutiny
  • Should a comprehensive gender-neutral rape case reach the Supreme Court, the Court may invoke the “basic structure” doctrine, emphasizing that equality and liberty are core to the Constitution. This could compel legislative revision if the Court determines the law is unconstitutional.

2. Need for Clarity and Enforcement

2.1 Legislative Amendments

• Definition Overhaul
  • Amending Section 63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) or equivalent provisions must include explicit, gender-neutral language. Clear statutory definitions help avoid ambiguity, ensuring law enforcement and courts recognize the crime irrespective of the survivor’s gender identity.
• Supplementary Provisions
  • Alongside redefining “rape,” the law should introduce or refine offenses like “sexual assault” or “aggravated sexual assault” to comprehensively address all forms of non-consensual acts. This layered approach mirrors jurisdictions such as Canada and the UK, which use multiple offense categories to cover varied assault scenarios.

2.2 Enforcement and Training

• Law Enforcement
  • Police officers require updated guidelines and training modules that help them handle complaints from male or transgender survivors sensitively and effectively. Without it, statutory reforms may exist on paper but fail in practice.
• Judiciary
  • Judges and prosecutors must be trained to interpret revised laws accurately, avoiding outdated gender biases. Regular judicial workshops can facilitate consistency in how courts apply and enforce gender-neutral provisions.
• Healthcare Professionals
  • Medical examinations and forensic procedures must be adapted to handle diverse survivor needs and anatomical variations. Sensitivity training is crucial so survivors are not re-traumatized.

3. Survivor-Centric Approach

3.1 Integrated Support Services

• Trauma Counseling
  • Professional counseling services should be made available at the earliest stage—beginning with the filing of a complaint—to support mental health and reduce secondary victimization.
• Medical Care
  • Standardized protocols for sexual assault examinations and evidence collection must accommodate survivors of all genders. Ensuring privacy and informed consent is particularly critical for transgender survivors who may already face discrimination in healthcare settings.
• Legal Aid
  • Free or subsidized legal counsel aids survivors in navigating complex criminal proceedings. Dedicated support cells within legal aid authorities can specifically cater to male and transgender survivors, who may otherwise struggle to find representation knowledgeable about gender-neutral provisions.

3.2 Collaborating with NGOs and Community Organizations

• Bridging Trust Deficits
  • Many survivors, especially male and transgender individuals, fear ridicule or harassment when reporting to mainstream authorities. NGOs trained in survivor advocacy can serve as liaisons, offering safe spaces for initial disclosures and helping survivors file complaints.
• Public Awareness Campaigns
  • Stigma remains a major barrier. Government and civil society can collaborate on targeted media campaigns to educate the public about new legal rights and encourage survivors to come forward.

By spotlighting these cases and examining the broader challenges they represent, it becomes evident that India’s legal apparatus, public discourse, and social services are unprepared to address sexual violence against men and transgender individuals. The absence of robust reporting mechanisms and targeted legal provisions perpetuates a culture of silence. This section underscores the urgent need for comprehensive reform—a transformation that begins by acknowledging that sexual violence transcends traditional gender boundaries and demands equal legal protection for every survivor.

STATISTICAL EVIDENCE: PREVALENCE OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AGAINST MEN AND TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS

Quantifying the prevalence of sexual assault on men and transgender individuals in India is challenging due to several factors, including underreporting, social stigma, and the lack of gender-neutral rape laws. Nevertheless, various NGOs, academic studies, and limited government surveys offer some insights. This section consolidates available data, both qualitative and quantitative, to underscore the magnitude of the problem.

1. Underreporting and Data Constraints
   • Cultural Stigma: Many male survivors either do not recognize their experiences as sexual assault due to deeply ingrained gender norms or choose not to report because of the fear of being disbelieved, stigmatized, or ridiculed. Transgender individuals often face additional layers of bias and violence, making them even more hesitant to seek legal recourse.
   • Legal Gaps: Because rape laws in India are not gender-neutral, crimes against male and transgender survivors are registered under alternative sections, such as “unnatural offenses,” “assault,” or “outraging modesty” (the latter often manipulated to fit the situation). This fragmentation makes it nearly impossible to track true sexual violence statistics for these groups.
   • Limited Official Surveys: The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) does not currently maintain a separate category for male or transgender survivors of rape. Hence, official figures do not reflect the reality on the ground.
2. Academic and NGO Studies on Male Survivors
   • Indicative Regional Studies:
     • A study conducted by the Center for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) in certain regions of India highlighted that a non-negligible percentage of men reported experiences of sexual abuse or coercion, often from their childhood years. While the sample sizes were relatively small, these findings pointed to the broader issue of violence against men going unacknowledged.
     • Other small-scale studies by universities, primarily in urban settings, suggest that anywhere between 5% and 15% of surveyed men reported experiencing some form of sexual coercion or assault in their lifetime.
   • NGO Documentation:
     • Organizations working with street children and juvenile shelters report frequent incidents of sexual violence against boys, both by peers and adult staff. Data is often anecdotal but underscores a pattern of systemic abuse.
     • Some NGOs dedicated to mental health and crisis intervention, such as Sneha or iCall helplines, have reported increasing calls from adult men who describe past or ongoing sexual abuse. While these hotlines provide confidentiality, they rarely funnel into official crime statistics due to survivors’ reluctance to file complaints.
3. Studies and Reports on Transgender Survivors
   • Impact of Social Marginalization: Research indicates transgender individuals in India face disproportionate levels of physical and sexual violence. One study by Sampoorna (a transgender rights collective) found that a significant percentage of transgender respondents reported experiencing sexual assault at various points in their lives, often by family members or local community members.
   • Sex Work and Elevated Risks: A considerable portion of India’s transgender population, especially Hijra communities, engage in sex work due to limited employment opportunities. Multiple reports, including those from UNAIDS, suggest that transgender sex workers are at an increased risk of sexual assault from clients, law enforcement, and the general public.
   • Healthcare Settings: In some instances, transgender survivors have reported sexual harassment or assault in healthcare facilities. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, does not sufficiently address such specific scenarios, leaving survivors dependent on general provisions that do not always recognize their legal standing as rape victims.
4. Comparative Global Data
   • World Health Organization (WHO) Estimates: While the WHO does not maintain country-specific breakdowns for India on male or transgender sexual assault, global estimates suggest that around 1 in 6 men experience some form of sexual abuse in their lifetime. The rate is considerably higher for transgender individuals, with multiple international studies indicating that anywhere from 40% to 66% of transgender people report experiencing sexual violence in their lifetimes, depending on the region and definitions used.
   • International NGOs: Groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented cases of male and transgender sexual violence worldwide, emphasizing the universal nature of the problem. These findings are often extrapolated to highlight the likelihood of underdocumented sexual violence in heavily populated countries like India.
5. Challenges in Data Collection and Interpretation
   • Non-Standard Terminology: Terms like “sexual assault,” “sexual violence,” and “rape” may be interpreted differently by different agencies and communities, particularly when legal definitions are not inclusive.
   • Sample Bias: Most existing surveys on sexual violence are designed to capture female-centric data, with male/transgender experiences often overlooked or deemed less statistically significant.
   • Fear of Legal Consequences: Transgender survivors engaged in sex work or men who experience assault in same-sex contexts may fear being criminalized or judged, especially before Section 377 of the IPC was partially read down in 2018 (and even after, stigma persists). This deters them from seeking help or participating in studies.
6. Significance of Accurate Data
   • Policy Formulation: Reliable statistics are crucial for drafting and implementing effective policies. Without accurate data, legislative bodies may underestimate the scope of the issue and fail to allocate necessary resources.
   • Judicial Recognition: Courts often rely on empirical data to assess the constitutionality of statutes. Showcasing a documented record of male and transgender sexual assault survivors can strengthen legal challenges calling for gender-neutral laws.
   • Public Awareness Campaigns: Comprehensive statistics can galvanize public opinion, dismantling harmful stereotypes that only women can be rape victims. This shift in perception is vital for encouraging men and transgender individuals to come forward.
7. Moving Toward Inclusion
   • Collaboration with Grassroots Organizations: Community-based organizations are best placed to conduct confidential surveys and gather first-hand testimonies. Engaging them is key to bridging knowledge gaps.
   • Incorporating Gender-Neutral Modules in Government Surveys: The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) and other government-led data collection initiatives could include sections addressing sexual violence against all genders.
   • Improving Training for Data Collectors: Enumerators and field researchers need training to ask non-judgmental, inclusive questions, ensuring respondents feel safe to disclose sensitive information.

In sum, while the existing data is fragmented and limited, it strongly indicates that men and transgender individuals are neither exempt from the threat of sexual violence nor adequately protected by current statutes. Developing robust, gender-neutral legal frameworks demands an equally robust dataset—one that captures the reality of all survivors and paves the way for effective legislative, judicial, and social interventions. As this paper continues, the lack of reliable data will be juxtaposed against international best practices to illustrate the urgent need for systemic reforms.

REFERENCES (INITIAL, NOT FINAL)

1. National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) – Annual Reports
2. Center for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) – Small-Scale Regional Studies
3. Sampoorna India – Transgender Community Research Data
4. Sneha, iCall, and Other Mental Health Helplines – Aggregated Helpline Logs
5. Human Rights Watch & Amnesty International – Reports on Male and Transgender Sexual Violence
6. United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) – Data on Transgender Sex Workers
7. World Health Organization (WHO) – Global Data on Male and Transgender Sexual Assault
8. National Family Health Survey (NFHS) – Potential Integration of Gender-Neutral Modules

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: GENDER-NEUTRAL RAPE LAWS AROUND THE WORLD

Examining legal frameworks from other countries that have already adopted gender-neutral rape laws provides valuable insights into how India might shape its reforms. These international examples illustrate the spectrum of legal definitions, enforcement mechanisms, and victim support systems that effectively encompass all survivors—irrespective of gender identity. By comparing these models, we can identify best practices and potential pitfalls, helping to craft legislation that addresses India’s unique cultural and social landscape.

1. UNITED KINGDOM
   • Sexual Offences Act, 2003
     • Defines rape as non-consensual penile penetration of the mouth, vagina, or anus, but also recognizes a range of other sexual offenses that apply equally to all genders (e.g., assault by penetration, sexual assault, and causing someone to engage in sexual activity without consent).
     • This layered approach means that while the act of “rape” is specifically defined in terms of penile penetration, the law contains multiple provisions under which survivors of any gender can seek justice for sexual violence.
     • Impact: The law’s comprehensiveness helps ensure that male or transgender survivors aren’t left without legal recourse. However, legal experts note that victims with different anatomies may still face obstacles in categorizing certain acts as “rape” under the strict definition of penile penetration, thereby shifting their claims to other offenses like “assault by penetration.”
2. CANADA
   • Criminal Code of Canada
     • Abolished the offense of “rape” in favor of a series of gender-neutral sexual assault provisions (Simple Sexual Assault, Sexual Assault with a Weapon, and Aggravated Sexual Assault).
     • The focus is on the nature of the assault—coercion, lack of consent, physical or psychological harm—rather than the gender of the survivor or perpetrator.
     • Impact: Canada’s shift toward entirely gender-neutral sexual assault laws is widely considered progressive. Legal frameworks focus on consent and the presence of violence or coercion. This has broadened protections, enabling men, transgender, and non-binary survivors to receive the same level of legal recognition as cisgender women.
3. SOUTH AFRICA
   • Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007
     • Defines a broad range of offenses in gender-neutral terms, including “rape” and “sexual assault.” Rape is described as any form of unlawful and intentional sexual penetration without consent, without specifying the gender of the offender or the survivor.
     • Specifically acknowledges anal, oral, and other forms of penetration as “rape” when non-consensual.
     • Impact: South Africa’s legislation has been lauded for its clarity and inclusivity. It addresses the realities of corrective rape (targeting LGBTQIA+ individuals) and provides a framework for prosecuting such cases effectively, at least in theory. Challenges remain in enforcement, as societal stigma persists.
4. AUSTRALIA
   • Varied State and Territory Laws
     • Each state and territory in Australia has its own criminal code, but most have moved toward gender-neutral language. Queensland, for instance, amended its definitions to include a broader concept of rape encompassing any non-consensual penetration.
     • Additional offenses cover other non-consensual acts, ensuring a spectrum of sexual crimes that can be prosecuted regardless of the genders involved.
     • Impact: While still evolving, Australia’s patchwork approach to gender-neutral definitions generally means male and transgender survivors have pathways to legal redress. Differences between states, however, can create inconsistencies in prosecutorial approaches and sentencing.
5. NEW ZEALAND
   • Crimes Act, 1961 (Amended)
     • Defines rape as penile penetration of a vagina without consent but also includes a broad classification of “unlawful sexual connection,” encompassing both same-sex and opposite-sex scenarios.
     • Amended provisions ensure that men and transgender survivors can seek justice for non-consensual penetrative acts under definitions like “sexual violation.”
     • Impact: Although “rape” remains partly gender-specific, parallel offenses under “sexual violation” are equally severe, ensuring survivors are not denied justice. Stakeholders have debated merging the terms into a single offense to reduce confusion.
6. UNITED STATES
   • Diverse State Laws; Federal Statutes
     • Definitions of rape and sexual assault vary among states. Some have adopted fully gender-neutral statutes, while others retain partial gender specificity. Federal law, particularly under the Department of Justice, uses a gender-neutral definition of rape for statistical reporting (“penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object … or oral penetration … without the consent of the victim”).
     • Impact: Shifting from older definitions to modern, gender-neutral ones has significantly increased reported statistics, indicating that more male survivors feel empowered to report. However, a patchwork of legal definitions still leads to inconsistencies in prosecution across states.
7. NEPAL
   • Existing Legal Framework
     • Rape is generally defined as an act against a woman, though there have been calls for reform. Some judicial voices have indicated the need to recognize male sexual assault, but it remains largely unaddressed.
     • Impact: Although not fully gender-neutral, Nepal offers a case study in a region culturally similar to India, demonstrating partial attempts at redefining sexual offenses. Ongoing debates underscore the possibility of near-future reforms.
8. BANGLADESH
   • Similar to Indian and Colonial Legal Roots
     • Definitions largely mirror the older Indian Penal Code. However, recent public discourse has begun advocating for expanded definitions, especially concerning marital rape and violence against other genders.
     • Impact: Though legal modernization is slow, activists often reference examples from other nations to push for inclusivity, suggesting a shift may be on the horizon.
9. KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR INDIA
   • Gender-Neutral or Layered Approach: International models generally converge on one core principle—focusing on the act of non-consensual sexual violation rather than the genders involved. Where the term “rape” remains partly gendered, additional provisions (e.g., “sexual assault,” “sexual violation,” etc.) provide equal protection and similar penalties.
   • Consent-Centric Definitions: Successful reforms emphasize lack of consent as the linchpin. This not only eliminates ambiguity but also respects survivors’ bodily autonomy, irrespective of their sex or gender identity.
   • Robust Victim Support Infrastructure: In countries that have adopted gender-neutral laws, there’s often a parallel emphasis on counseling, medical care, and protective services for all survivors. Legal definitions alone are insufficient without supportive frameworks.
   • Incremental vs. Comprehensive Overhaul: While some countries (like Canada) took a sweeping approach by abolishing the term “rape” in favor of a broader set of sexual offenses, others updated their laws in increments. In India’s context, either approach could work but must be accompanied by thorough training of the judiciary and police.

By reviewing these international models, it becomes evident that defining sexual offenses in a gender-neutral manner is not only feasible but also crucial for ensuring comprehensive protections. Countries that continue to rely on a gender-binary definition of rape often find themselves at odds with emerging social realities and human rights standards. India’s legislative reforms, therefore, have ample global precedents to emulate—each providing valuable lessons in both best practices and areas for caution.

REFERENCES (INITIAL, NOT FINAL)

1. Sexual Offences Act, 2003 (United Kingdom)
2. Criminal Code of Canada (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)
3. Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (South Africa)
4. Queensland Criminal Code (Australia) – Amendments for Gender-Neutral Language
5. Crimes Act 1961 (New Zealand) – Amendments for Sexual Violation Definitions
6. United States Department of Justice – Revised Uniform Definition of Rape (2012)
7. Nepal’s Penal Code, 2017 (preliminary references to rape definitions)
8. Bangladesh Penal Code – Proposals for Gender-Neutral Revisions

PROPOSED ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGAL REFORM

The Indian legal system stands at a crossroads: either continue adhering to a gender-specific definition of rape or evolve into a more inclusive framework that acknowledges every survivor’s right to justice. By examining legislative practices worldwide and analyzing empirical data on sexual violence against men and transgender individuals, it becomes evident that reform is not just necessary—it is inevitable. This section puts forward concrete recommendations to align India’s sexual offense laws with constitutional guarantees of equality (Article 14) and personal liberty (Article 21), as well as evolving international human rights standards.

1. Amend Section 63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
   • Redefine Rape in Gender-Neutral Terms:
     • Replace the phrase “a man commits rape upon a woman” with inclusive language such as “any person commits rape upon another person.”
     • Recognize various forms of penetration (vaginal, anal, oral) and explicitly include cases where the survivor’s gender identity does not align with the outdated male-female binary.
   • Clarify Consent and Coercion:
     • Embed a clear, consent-centric definition, focusing on the absence of voluntary, unequivocal, and informed agreement.
     • List scenarios that automatically negate consent (e.g., intoxication, threat, fraud, incapacity, or misuse of authority). This fosters consistency in legal interpretation and closes potential loopholes.
2. Create Parallel Offenses for Non-Penetrative Sexual Crimes
   • Sexual Assault and Aggravated Sexual Assault:
     • Introduce layered offenses to address non-penetrative yet severe sexual violations, ensuring that survivors do not lose legal coverage due to technicalities in the rape definition.
     • Base penalties on the severity of harm or threat involved, mirroring best practices from jurisdictions like the UK and Canada.
   • Harassment, Molestation, and Other Offenses:
     • Provide explicit language covering sexual harassment, attempted rape, and other related offenses in a gender-neutral manner.
     • Ensure that aggravated circumstances—such as the involvement of weapons, coercion in custodial settings, or offenses against minors—carry enhanced penalties.
3. Establish Legal Provisions for Transgender and Non-Binary Survivors
   • Integration with the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019:
     • Modify both the BNS and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act to ensure cross-references and cohesive protections for transgender survivors of sexual violence.
     • Define clear procedures and guidelines for law enforcement to follow when transgender or non-binary survivors report crimes, including respectful communication and choice of lock-up if arrest is involved.
   • Dedicated Statutory Safeguards:
     • Mandate specialized protocols for medical examinations and forensic procedures respecting the survivor’s gender identity and privacy.
     • Require sensitivity training for police, forensic teams, and medical professionals to minimize secondary victimization.
4. Introduce a Gender-Neutral Marital Rape Clause
   • Revisit the Concept of Marital Rape:
     • Eliminate exceptions that exclude marital relationships from rape definitions. Recognize that consent within marriage is not automatic or irrevocable.
     • A gender-neutral marital rape law would protect spouses of all genders and sexual orientations, aligning with international norms of bodily autonomy.
   • Safe Reporting and Rehabilitation:
     • Provide clear guidelines to law enforcement for handling marital rape complaints without trivializing them.
     • Develop state-funded counseling centers for survivors, focusing on emotional and psychological support to navigate complex marital dynamics.
5. Enhance Procedural Safeguards and Victim Support
   • Fast-Track Courts and Special Units:
     • Expand the scope of fast-track courts to handle all sexual assault cases, regardless of the survivor’s gender.
     • Create specialized units or cells within law enforcement dedicated to investigating sexual crimes involving men, transgender, and non-binary survivors, ensuring familiarity with these survivors’ needs.
   • Victim-Witness Protection:
     • Enforce anonymity measures and safe testimony options (e.g., video conferencing) to mitigate societal backlash and intimidation, especially in cases involving transgender survivors who are particularly vulnerable.
     • Establish guidelines that protect survivors’ identities during investigations and trial proceedings.
6. Mandatory Training and Sensitization Programs
   • For Law Enforcement:
     • Regular workshops on gender sensitivity, emphasizing that sexual violence can occur regardless of a victim’s gender identity.
     • Training on the revised legal provisions, evidence collection in gender-neutral contexts, and best practices for survivor interaction.
   • For Judiciary:
     • Conferences and refresher courses for judges on evolving definitions of sexual assault and the unique challenges faced by male, transgender, and non-binary survivors.
     • Updated judicial guidelines for sentencing in gender-neutral rape cases, promoting consistency across courts.
7. Statistical Tracking and Reporting
   • Amendments to NCRB Data Collection:
     • Instruct the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) to introduce dedicated categories for male and transgender survivors of sexual assault.
     • Track data on offenses, arrests, convictions, and demographics to inform policy and resource allocation.
   • Collaboration with NGOs and Research Bodies:
     • Commission studies to gather nationwide data on underreported sexual violence among men and transgender individuals.
     • Use these findings to refine laws, train personnel, and guide public awareness campaigns.
8. Comprehensive Public Awareness Campaigns
   • Destigmatizing Male and Transgender Victimhood:
     • Government-sponsored campaigns on television, radio, and digital platforms that affirm any person can be a survivor of sexual violence.
     • Collaborations with film industries, social media influencers, and educational institutions to shift cultural narratives and break taboos.
   • Encouraging Reporting and Support:
     • Helpline numbers and crisis centers specifically advertised for men and transgender survivors.
     • Strategic outreach in rural and semi-urban areas, where social stigma often prevents survivors from seeking help.
9. Constitutional Validity and PIL Strategy
   • Leveraging Article 14, Article 21:
     • Argue that gender-specific rape laws violate the fundamental rights to equality and personal liberty by excluding certain survivors from the justice system.
     • Highlight judicial observations (obiter dicta) that already suggest a need for inclusive interpretations of sexual crimes.
   • Public Interest Litigations:
     • File or support PILs targeting the constitutionality of existing laws, accompanied by comprehensive data on the magnitude of the problem.
     • Ensure representation from a diverse coalition of survivors, activists, and legal experts to bolster credibility and societal impact.
10. Phase-Wise Implementation

• Immediate Legislative Amendments:
  • Address urgent revisions, such as redefining the term “rape” in Section 63 of the BNS, through an ordinance or fast-tracked bill if possible.
• Intermediate Steps:
  • Introduce mandated training programs, pilot special police units, and begin data collection reforms.
• Long-Term Goals:
  • Integrate further refinements based on initial implementation feedback, including expanded victim support services and additional protections for high-risk groups (e.g., persons with disabilities, sex workers).

By adopting these measures, India can make decisive strides toward a legal system that does not discriminate based on a survivor’s gender identity. Gender-neutral reforms would underscore the nation’s commitment to upholding human rights, fulfilling constitutional guarantees, and aligning with progressive global standards. Such an inclusive approach not only enhances justice for survivors but also strengthens society’s collective moral fabric—sending a powerful message that violence, in any form and against any person, will not be tolerated.

REFERENCES (INITIAL, NOT FINAL)

1. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Section 63
2. Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
3. Criminal Law (Amendment) Acts (1983, 2013) – Provisions on Sexual Offenses
4. Sexual Offences Act, 2003 (United Kingdom) – Consent-Centric Approach
5. Criminal Code of Canada – Gender-Neutral Sexual Assault Laws
6. Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (South Africa)
7. Comparative Study of Global Marital Rape Legislation (UN Women, Multiple Reports)
8. National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) – Potential Data Collection Reforms
9. Government of India Guidelines on Fast Track Courts, 2012 & beyond
10. Various Public Interest Litigations Filed on Section 375 IPC and Gender-Neutral Legislation (references to be compiled)

CONCLUSION & WAY FORWARD

The quest for gender-neutral rape laws in India symbolizes more than just a legislative amendment; it represents a fundamental shift in how society recognizes, addresses, and redresses sexual violence against all survivors. Throughout this paper, we have explored the evolution of rape laws from colonial-era frameworks to the present Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The persistent omission of men, transgender, and non-binary individuals from the legal definition of rape not only jeopardizes the constitutional guarantee of equality (Article 14) but also denies survivors the possibility of seeking justice.

Key Observations and Insights:

1. Historic Bias: Colonial statutes, carried over into the IPC and now partially mirrored in the BNS, reflect a deeply rooted patriarchal mindset, framing sexual violence as exclusively male-against-female.
2. Underreporting & Stigma: A lack of legal recognition perpetuates severe underreporting among male and transgender survivors, leading to an incomplete statistical picture and inadequate policy interventions.
3. Societal and Cultural Barriers: Traditional norms surrounding masculinity and gender identity compound the trauma for survivors, often preventing them from speaking out or filing complaints.
4. Judicial Gaps: While the judiciary has offered occasional obiter dicta hinting at gender-inclusive interpretations, a definitive precedent expanding the legal definition of rape remains elusive.
5. International Precedents: Countries like Canada, South Africa, and several others have introduced gender-neutral sexual assault provisions, demonstrating the feasibility and moral necessity of inclusive definitions.

The Way Forward:

1. Legislative Overhaul: Amending Section 63 of the BNS to adopt gender-inclusive language is imperative. This includes redefining rape to focus on non-consensual sexual acts rather than on rigid gender roles.
2. Marital Rape Clause: Eliminating marital exceptions and making the offense gender-neutral underlines the principle that consent cannot be presumed in any relationship.
3. Focused Support Systems: Establishing survivor-centric infrastructure, such as fast-track courts and specialized investigation units, is crucial for delivering timely justice. Counseling services, legal aid, and medical care must be accessible to all survivors, irrespective of their gender identity.
4. Data & Reporting: Institutionalizing the collection of statistics on male and transgender sexual violence can catalyze targeted reforms. Partnering with NGOs and community groups ensures ground-level realities are captured and addressed.
5. Social Awareness: Sustained public awareness campaigns are essential to destigmatize the notion of male or transgender victimhood. Media outlets, educational institutions, and digital platforms can play pivotal roles in challenging stereotypes.

Final Reflections:

• Constitutional Necessity: India’s constitutional fabric demands equity and justice for every citizen. Excluding any community from protective laws is antithetical to the spirit of Articles 14, 15, and 21.
• Moral and Human Rights Imperative: Beyond constitutional mandates, a gender-neutral legal framework for rape aligns India with international human rights standards, reinforcing the universal principle that sexual violence is an affront to human dignity, no matter who the survivor is.
• Momentum for Change: Activists, legal experts, and survivors have steadily grown more vocal about the need for inclusivity. This collective voice can push legislators and policymakers to confront entrenched biases and align India’s laws with contemporary global benchmarks.

By systematically addressing the legal, societal, and infrastructural deficits outlined in this research, India can take a historic step toward ensuring that no survivor of sexual violence is left without recourse. The road ahead is undoubtedly complex, involving significant shifts in policy, policing, judiciary training, and cultural mindset. Yet, each step forward strengthens the nation’s commitment to justice, paving the way for a more inclusive future where every individual’s right to bodily autonomy and dignity is respected.

I. Indian Statutes and Constitutional Articles

1. Indian Constitution
   • Article 14: Equality Before Law
   • Article 15: Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Religion, Race, Caste, Sex, or Place of Birth
   • Article 21: Protection of Life and Personal Liberty
   • Link (Government of India / Legislative Dept.):
     https://legislative.gov.in/constitution-of-india
2. Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 (Historical context)
   • Sections 354 (Outraging Modesty), 375 (Rape), 377 (Unnatural Offenses)
   • Link (Bare Act PDF from Law Ministry):
     https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1860-45.pdf
3. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
   • Section 63 (Definition of Rape)
   • Note: Official consolidated texts may not be fully available online yet.
   • Link (Government Press Release/Updates):
     https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1949492
     (Provides background on new criminal law bills replacing the IPC.)
4. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983
   • Introduced changes addressing custodial rape.
   • Link (Bare Act / Govt. Publication Archive):
     https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1724
5. Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
   • Broadened the definition of rape post-Nirbhaya case.
   • Link (Bare Act PDF):
     https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2013/E_30_2013_212.pdf
6. Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
   • Provisions for transgender rights (lacks explicit reference to rape or sexual assault).
   • Link (Bare Act PDF from Social Justice Dept.):
     https://socialjustice.gov.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/TG%20Act,%202019.pdf

---

II. Major Case Laws and Judicial References

1. Mathura Rape Case
   • Tuka Ram and Anr vs. State of Maharashtra, 1978 AIR 185
   • Link (Supreme Court of India Judgments Repository):
     https://main.sci.gov.in/judgments
     (Search by case name or citation.)
2. NALSA vs. Union of India (2014) 5 SCC 438
   • Recognized transgender as the ‘third gender.’
   • Link (Supreme Court of India PDF Judgment):
     https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/41411.pdf
3. Delhi Gang Rape (Nirbhaya), 2012
   • Sparked the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
   • Link (Case references in Supreme Court):
     https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/41303.pdf
     (Final judgment upholding convictions.)
4. Selected High Court & Supreme Court Observations
   • Obiter dicta on inclusivity of sexual offense definitions (various orders).
   • Link (Supreme Court of India / High Courts):
     • SC E-Filing: https://main.sci.gov.in/efiling
     • Bombay High Court: https://bombayhighcourt.nic.in
       (Search specific case names, PIL numbers, or relevant keywords.)

---

III. Reports, Surveys, and NGO Data

1. National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) Annual Reports
   • Crime statistics (largely exclude separate data on male/trans survivors).
   • Link: https://ncrb.gov.in
2. CEHAT (Center for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes)
   • Regional studies on male sexual abuse.
   • Link: https://www.cehat.org
3. NGO Publications (Sneha, iCall, Sampoorna, etc.)
   • Documented anecdotal evidence and helpline data for male and transgender survivors.
   • Representative Links:
     • Sneha: https://www.sneha.org.in
     • iCall: https://icallhelpline.org
     • Sampoorna (Trans* Community Group): https://www.sampoornaindiablog.wordpress.com (Community-run website.)
4. Child Abuse Reports in Juvenile Homes
   • Various investigations highlighting abuse of boys.
   • Link (NCPCR): https://ncpcr.gov.in
5. Human Rights Watch & Amnesty International
   • Reports on custodial violence, transgender rights, and male sexual assault.
   • Links:
     • HRW (India): https://www.hrw.org/asia/india
     • Amnesty India (Archival): https://amnesty.org.in

---

IV. International Legal Frameworks

1. Sexual Offences Act, 2003 (United Kingdom)
   • Consent-centric, partially gender-neutral approach.
   • Link (UK Legislation):
     https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents
2. Criminal Code of Canada (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)
   • Completely gender-neutral sexual assault definitions.
   • Link (Department of Justice Canada):
     https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/
3. Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (South Africa)
   • Inclusive definitions of rape and sexual assault.
   • Link (South African Government):
     https://www.gov.za/documents/criminal-law-sexual-offences-and-related-matters-amendment-act
4. Queensland Criminal Code (Australia)
   • Amendments for gender-neutral language.
   • Link (Queensland Legislation):
     https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1899-009
5. Crimes Act, 1961 (New Zealand) – Amended
   • “Sexual violation” category covering diverse scenarios.
   • Link (NZ Legislation):
     https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM327382.html
6. United States Department of Justice
   • Revised uniform definition of rape (2012) for statistical purposes.
   • Link (DOJ Archive):
     https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape
7. Nepal’s Penal Code, 2017
   • Ongoing discussions to expand the definition of rape beyond female victims.
   • Link (Nepal Law Commission):
     http://www.lawcommission.gov.np/en/archives/category/documents/prevailing-law/statutes-acts
8. Bangladesh Penal Code
   • Mirroring colonial-era definitions, with proposals for gender-neutral reforms.
   • Link (Bangladesh Laws):
     http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-11.html

---

V. International Human Rights Instruments

1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
   • Mandates equal protection for all individuals.
   • Link (UN Treaty Collection):
     https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4
2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
   • Underpins the principle of non-discrimination.
   • Link (UN):
     https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
3. United Nations Treaty Reports
   • Specific references to violence against LGBTQIA+ communities.
   • Link (OHCHR):
     https://www.ohchr.org (Contains reports and committees’ observations.)

---

VI. Additional Scholarly Articles and Publications

1. Various Law Review Journals
   • Discussions on constitutional validity of gender-specific laws.
   • Example:
     • National Law School Journals, SCC Online: https://www.scconline.com
2. Academic Theses & Conference Papers
   • Addressing transgender rights, male victimization, and comparative legal studies.
   • Links:
     • Shodhganga (Indian ETD Repository): https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in

---

VII. Media and Public Discourse

1. Newspaper Articles & Investigative Reports
   • Documenting male and transgender rape cases occasionally covered by regional media.
   • Examples:
     • Deccan Herald: https://www.deccanherald.com
     • The Hindu: https://www.thehindu.com
2. Social Media Platforms
   • Survivor-led campaigns and NGO-driven awareness hashtags.
   • Twitter: https://twitter.com
   • Facebook: https://facebook.com
   • Instagram: https://instagram.com

---

VIII. Additional URL References

(For Court Filings and NGO Data)

• Supreme Court of India E-Filing:
  https://main.sci.gov.in/efiling
• Bombay High Court:
  https://bombayhighcourt.nic.in
• Amnesty International India (Archival):
  https://amnesty.org.in (May redirect or show limited content due to operational changes in India.)
• Human Rights Watch – India:
  https://www.hrw.org/asia/india

---

Note on Accessibility and Updates

• Official Government Websites (e.g., legislative.gov.in, egazette.nic.in, ncrb.gov.in) regularly update or reorganize their resources. If a link is broken, you may need to use the site’s search function or check web archives.
• Court Portals (main.sci.gov.in, bombayhighcourt.nic.in) may require case numbers or petition details to locate exact documents.
• NGO Links can also evolve; if a page is missing, search the NGO’s main domain or contact them directly.

---

Disclaimer

• While all links are provided to the best of current knowledge, website structures may change, and older documents can be moved or archived.
• For official legal texts, it’s advisable to verify the current version of the statute from government sources or updated legislative portals.
• Some studies or reports are only available upon request or through limited-access databases.

---

This consolidated reference list aims to facilitate comprehensive research and advocacy efforts for gender-neutral rape laws in India. By drawing on these statutes, case laws, NGO reports, and international frameworks, stakeholders can gain robust insights into the existing gaps, global best practices, and the urgent need for inclusive legal reform.